These tasks extend the textbook's reading work by moving from literal understanding into inference, paragraph function, and evidence evaluation.
Exercise 1.1 - Reading Between the Lines
This task extends textbook-style comprehension into inference. Students must judge whether a claim is supported, contradicted, or simply absent from the article.
Mandarin-speaking learners often stay at surface meaning, so the stronger items deliberately require them to check the author's exact stance rather than rely on intuition.
这道题把教材式理解题进一步推进到推断层面。学生必须判断一个说法是被支持、被否定,还是根本没有在文中出现。
中文母语学习者容易停留在表层意义,因此较难的题目刻意要求他们核对作者的准确立场,而不是凭感觉作答。
Skill focus: deciding whether a claim is supported, contradicted, or not addressed.
Read the statements below. Decide if each statement is strongly supported by the text (Yes), contradicted by the text (No), or not directly addressed (Not Given).
| Statement | Yes | No | Not Given |
|---|---|---|---|
| The swamp sparrow's ability to learn songs supports the idea that animals can have culture. | |||
| Robert Lachlan believes that conformist bias is unique to humans. | |||
| The research team studied swamp sparrows in both the United States and Canada. | |||
| Lachlan's findings suggest that young sparrows could create different song traditions if they chose to. | |||
| Scientists previously believed that only humans passed down traditions over long periods. |
Exercise 1.2 - Text Organisation: Paragraph Function
This exercise makes the article's structure visible: introduction, method, findings, and implications. That helps students move from sentence-level understanding to whole-text awareness.
It also answers the teacher's request that Section 1 should reinforce and extend textbook reading skills instead of operating as a separate mini-course.
这道题把文章的结构显性化:引入、方法、发现、意义。这样学生就能从“看懂句子”进一步走向“看懂整篇文章”。
它也回应了教师的要求:第一节应该强化并延伸教材里的阅读技能,而不是变成另一套独立课程。
Skill focus: recognising how an English informational text moves from introduction to method, findings, and implications.
Match each paragraph (A-E) with its primary function. One function is not used.
| Paragraph | Function |
|---|---|
| A - Paragraph 1 (introduction about sparrow songs) | 1. Present research methodology |
| B - Paragraph 2 (Lachlan's research design) | 2. Introduce topic and context |
| C - Paragraph 3 (recording 615 male sparrows) | 3. Present findings and data |
| D - Paragraph 4 (2% variation and conformist bias) | 4. Discuss implications and future research |
| E - Paragraph 5 (Lachlan's conclusion and Farnsworth's response) | 5. Provide historical background |
Write the correct number (1-5) for each paragraph. One number is extra.
- A: _______
- B: _______
- C: _______
- D: _______
- E: _______
Exercise 1.3 - Evidence Evaluation: Fact, Interpretation, or Not Stated?
This task trains students to distinguish data from interpretation and unsupported claims. That is a core scientific-reading habit, not just a language exercise.
The extra "Not Stated" category matters because learners often confuse missing evidence with disagreement. This version makes that distinction explicit.
这道题训练学生区分数据、解释性结论以及没有证据支撑的说法。这是科学阅读的核心习惯,而不只是语言练习。
额外加入的 “Not Stated” 选项很重要,因为学生常常会把“文中没说”和“文中反对”混在一起。
Skill focus: distinguishing directly stated evidence from interpretation and unsupported claims.
Label each statement as Fact (F), Interpretation (I), or Not Stated (NS).
- ____ Between 2008 and 2009, Lachlan's research team recorded the calls of 615 male sparrows.
- ____ The fact that sparrows have sung the same songs for 1,000 years proves they have conformist bias.
- ____ Only 2 percent of male sparrows sang a sufficiently different song from the standard tune.
- ____ Lachlan's study shows that animal traditions can last just as long as human traditions.
- ____ The sparrow's brain contains neurons that help it remember songs.